Solutions
Software built around the problem, not the category.
- Proprietary product
- MAP Protector
- Bespoke delivery
- Custom business systems
- Engagement
- Scoped, specified, delivered
MAP Protector — our first proprietary solution.
A brand protection and commerce monitoring platform for manufacturers, distributors and brands that need to monitor advertised marketplace pricing against their Minimum Advertised Price policies, identify potential discrepancies at scale, and keep the supporting evidence in one place.
Monitoring
Advertised price observations
Rules
MAP thresholds per product or SKU
Workflow
Review queues and evidence
Architecture
Multi-marketplace by design
01Solution areas
Six problems we are asked to solve most often.
Marketplace Intelligence
Pricing, sellers and listings change constantly across channels, and the people responsible for a brand rarely have a current view of any of it.
Approach
Collect marketplace data through authorised integrations, normalise it into one model, apply the rules that matter to your business and surface what needs attention.
Outcomes
- One current view of advertised pricing and seller activity
- Thresholds and alerts instead of manual spot-checking
- Historical context behind each observation
Commerce Operations
Catalogue, pricing, inventory and order data live in several systems that were never designed to agree with each other.
Approach
Build the operational layer between those systems: synchronisation, validation, exception handling and the tooling your team needs to resolve what cannot be automated.
Outcomes
- Fewer listing and fulfilment errors
- Clear ownership of each data flow
- Exceptions routed to a person instead of disappearing
Data Visibility
Reporting is assembled by hand from exports, so it is slow, inconsistent and impossible to audit.
Approach
Ingest from the source systems, model the data once, and build reporting on top of definitions everyone has agreed to.
Outcomes
- Reports that reconcile between teams
- Daily operational dashboards, not monthly reconstructions
- A data model that new questions can be asked of
Process Automation
Recurring work — imports, exports, checks, notifications — consumes skilled time and breaks quietly when someone is away.
Approach
Map the process, automate the deterministic parts, and design explicit handling for the cases that genuinely need judgement.
Outcomes
- Recurring work that runs on schedule
- Visible failures instead of silent ones
- Capacity returned to the team
Platform Integration
Each new platform adds another bespoke connection, and the cost of change grows with every one of them.
Approach
Introduce an integration layer with consistent authentication, retries, logging and schema handling, so platforms connect to one boundary rather than to each other.
Outcomes
- New integrations delivered without rewriting the last one
- Consistent error handling and observability
- Less coupling between systems that change independently
Custom Business Systems
The way your business works does not map onto off-the-shelf software, so the process is stretched to fit the tool.
Approach
Design the system around the actual process — data model, roles, screens and integrations — and keep it small enough to maintain.
Outcomes
- Software that matches how the work is really done
- Fewer parallel spreadsheets and workarounds
- A platform that can absorb the next process change
02Custom solutions
If it doesn't exist yet, we build it.
That work usually starts the same way. There is a process that matters commercially, it is held together by spreadsheets and manual steps, and every attempt to buy a solution has ended in a compromise that nobody is happy with.
We scope it properly, specify it in writing, and build the smallest system that genuinely solves it — with the integrations, permissions and reporting it needs to be used in anger.
Discovery
Process mapping, systems inventory, constraints and success criteria.
Specification
Data model, integration boundaries and behaviour, written down.
Delivery
Working increments, reviewed against the specification.
Handover
Documentation, monitoring and a system your team can run.
Not sure which of these describes your situation? Most conversations start with an operational problem rather than a solution name.
Look at services insteadNext step
Let's build something useful.
Tell us what you are trying to operate, integrate or automate. If Projectix is not the right fit, we will say so.